![artinfoft vbuc rar artinfoft vbuc rar](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/aNR0bGTeQs8/maxresdefault.jpg)
The approach does not produce production ready software on the first try, but it can be improved and made to produce "better" software by modifying the configuration of the tool and re-running the translation process. We also use this process to migrate ASP sites to ASPX, (we also have a multi-dialect FORTRAN-to-C product) We can author both VB.NET and C# using this approach. The transformation rules are designed by people and created "by hand" to meet their unique requirements.įinally, the model is "executed" but instead of allocating the data model and executing the operations, we author the file structures, data model, and operations in the notation of the target platform. NET and optionally applies custom transformations for example to replace COM components with.
Artinfoft vbuc rar series#
The tool then applies a series of algorithms that modify and restructure the model to make it more compatible with. This model is an extremely detailed set of symbol tables and opcode streams that fully and accurately describe all information structures defined and operations performed by the source system. The compiler reads a VBP (or group of related VBPs) and referenced COM libraries and constructs a "semantic model". So, it can be done (I have done it with 3 or 4 large projects), but there is no panacea, no silver bullet, and any tool that says it will do it for you alone, is lying.Īt GreatMigrations, we do this by hand - we use our hands to develop a VB6/COM compiler. Rewritting from scratch, however, may take twice as long and you lose all of your business logic. In the end you will get a base, but converting a large project (20-30 forms, 30 classes, 30 modules) can take several man months. If you used a lot of API calls, they tend to need rewritting. If you used Variants at all those all have to be rewritten.
Artinfoft vbuc rar code#
Also all of your code with be littered with the VB helpers rather than using proper DotNet functions (all the string functions are helpers rather than class objects, for examples0. The conversion gets you at best 50% of the way there, you have to fix a ton of stuff (you will see your code littered with TODO's), refactor a ton of stuff, and at the end you are left with C# that is a representation of your VB6 - unless you have very nice VB6 code not a place you really want to be. Once you have got your code converted into C#, you have to start the real work.
![artinfoft vbuc rar artinfoft vbuc rar](https://downloaddevtools-ds1.dlcddt.ir/files/2665/ProBanner/banner.png)
Also the Visual Studio converter fails on a lot of large projects, just hangs and never completes. With Reflector you lose a bunch of stuff. It screws up all the array references and thinks that they are function calls, and all the logical operators are converted to bitwise logical operators (And becomes & not &). With the SharpDevelop conversion, a few caveats. You can use the VB6 to VB.Net tool as stated in this answer, and then use either Reflector or SharpDevelop to convert to C#. As someone who has done this a bunch of times, this is not an easy process.